Workgroup on Solidarity Socio-Economy





   
pronto disponible

  November 20, 2008
Workgroup on Solidarity Socio-Economy Economic Actors' Societal Responsibility

news
How can we translate a standard or a charter into practical applications in a local context?
Vincent Commenne
March, 2007


Launching meeting of the workshop - Dourdan (France)
Sept. 30 - Oct. 1st, 2003

more news
documents
more documents
books
Solidarity Economy: Building Alternatives for People and Planet
By Julie Matthaei, Jenna Allard & Carl Davidson
April, 2008


Asian Forum for Solidarity Economy
Manila (Philippines)
October 17-20, 2007

Economic Actors' Societal Responsibility

Promoting business ethics and responsible consumption by a qualitative societal dialogue: setting up of test-structures regrouping stakeholders

Context
What to do in order that increasingly more and more enterprises get involved in a way of "good citizen company", what to do in order that increasingly more consumers become "responsible" and find on the market the products of "clean" consumption they are looking for?

In an apparently paradoxical way, the ethical dynamics of business are still very often the object of confrontations or polarizations between the interested actors. Any person involved in the fields linked to business ethics knows that when companies edict conduct codes in an independent way or get involved in any citizens process in an isolated way, they often cause the distrust of the NGO's that suspect them of "window dressing", of a marketing operation that is not followed by real effects. And on their side, these NGO's often appear exclusively critical with regard to any initiative of the business world in ethical matters, whatever sincere these efforts sometimes are. These dissensions contribute considerably to slow down the emergence of more ethical ways of producing and disturb the consumer who would wish to enter in a more responsible consumption. To restore a balance, it is now important and urgent to encourage to the maximum consensual dynamics.

To do so, the careful observers agree on the primordial importance of communication between the stakeholders, that means besides the companies, the trade unions, the NGO's, the consumers organizations, the representatives of the shareholding, etc. Increasingly, in the specialized places, the dialogue between stakeholders even appears as the "last mode". At the same time, the promoter of the present project has participated for about fifteen years in numerous events (conferences, workshops, symposia.) linked to the ethics of business and he had to note that when dialogue was on the agenda, it was reduced in almost all the cases to the fact that each one successively exposes its position, then listens politely to the other, but without giving place to a true common construction.

There is therefore a need to implement spaces that enable a real dialogue between stakeholders, a societal dialogue from where it would emerge:

  • positions that satisfy the totality of the stakeholders and that each will be able to support during the continuation of the process;
  • realistic and desirable objectives for business that wish to enter into a dynamics of solidarity or sustainable development
  • a unified communication toward consumers
  • examples of "best practices" to spread
  • last but not least, a methodology of societal dialogue that will be reproducible
A pilot project
The present project wishes to be a pilot project in this sense.
Its final objective is the development of a responsible production and consumption.
The means will be the setting up of "groups of dialogue-tests" that will enable to identify the optimal working conditions of future "multistakeholders" structures.
The added value of the project would, in fine, be materialized in the publication of a booklet that will serve as a guide in this field and be communicated to numerous initiatives linked to this field.

Test -Structures
At the beginning and according to our experience, we estimate that the best dynamics will be those that will be built:

  • following a non confronting dialogue,
  • on precise topics,
  • in a small group of experts (a dozen of women and men),
  • where time is sufficiently broad to truly listen to the others and then, build together on a maximum consensual basis
  • and this, thanks to the support of a professional of mediation. (intervening softly and only when needed).

These are some elements that lead to a brief model but that seems to us as a qualitative break with all that is done currently. An objective is also that, following the experimentations of the test-phase, one can identify the values necessary to a common working process and, starting out, to write a sort of working charter.

[download entire text]

   

top of page ^


Awele: Reap what you share
powered by Awele